Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 7.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3-4B specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.831.5
Released2023-11-292025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked156

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1096—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles0%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1070—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.54—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1108—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond24.6%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1073—
LMArena Chinese1132—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1079—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1092—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1105—
LMArena Creative Writing1067—
LMArena Multi-Turn1082—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3-4B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper