Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3-4B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.