Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 29.1 to 7.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.929.3
Released2023-11-292024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding10961101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701100
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math11081151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731058
LMArena Chinese11321061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10921088

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text11051110
LMArena Creative Writing10671083
LMArena Multi-Turn10821068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper