Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Phi-1.5

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi-1.5 specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.9—
Released2023-11-292023-09-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked157

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
LMArena Coding1096—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index110.591.53
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1070—
HellaSwag—47.6%
WinoGrande—73.4%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Phi-1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
LMArena Math1108—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
BoolQ—75.8%
MMLU—37.6%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1073—
LMArena Chinese1132—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
LMArena Instruction Following1079—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1092—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi-1.5
LMArena Text1105—
LMArena Creative Writing1067—
LMArena Multi-Turn1082—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Phi-1.5?

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi-1.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper