Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 31.9.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.