Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Mistral Medium

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 31.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 81.6% for Mistral Medium.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Mistral Medium specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index24.936.3
Released2023-11-292023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1536

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Coding10961434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts10701426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%32.2%
LMArena Math11081408
MATH Level 56.4%81.6%
ProofBench—9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
GPQA Diamond24.6%59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Vision—1172

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Non-English10731408
LMArena Chinese11321447
LMArena French—1459
LMArena German—1432
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Russian—1411
LMArena Spanish—1433

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following10791398

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query10921406

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMistral Medium
LMArena Text11051424
LMArena Creative Writing10671391
LMArena Multi-Turn10821418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Mistral Medium?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Mistral Medium share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper