Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemma 7B

Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 7B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 31.2 to 8.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemma 7B specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index24.930.0
Released2023-11-292024-02-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Coding10961048
HumanEval+—28.7%
MBPP+—43.4%

Reasoning Gemma 7B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts10701042
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5111.99
Chess Puzzles0%—
Adversarial NLI—48.7%
BIG-Bench Hard—55.1%
HellaSwag—82.2%
PIQA—81.2%
WinoGrande—79%

Math Gemma 7B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Math11081066
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—
GSM8K—46.4%

Knowledge Gemma 7B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1001
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—83.2%
MMLU—66.1%
OpenBookQA—78.6%
TriviaQA—72.3%

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Non-English1073999
LMArena Chinese11321035
LMArena French—1025
LMArena Russian—993

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Instruction Following10791017

Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Longer Query10921022

Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGemma 7B
LMArena Text11051056
LMArena Creative Writing10671024
LMArena Multi-Turn1082963

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemma 7B?

Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemma 7B better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemma 7B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper