Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 38.2.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.943.2
Released2024-06-172025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding12511439
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts12071428
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math12411426
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert11811442
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Deepseek Coder v2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English11821405
LMArena Chinese12011463
LMArena French11851452
LMArena German11641424
LMArena Japanese11261385
LMArena Korean11041394
LMArena Russian11881408
LMArena Spanish11531428

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11801406

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query12191420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text11911420
LMArena Creative Writing11201366
LMArena Multi-Turn11771428

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper