Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 32.3.
  • Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.951.5
Released2024-06-172026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12511498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
ALE-Bench—1,189
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Deepseek Coder v2: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12071483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math12411490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert11811488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English11821474
LMArena Chinese12011530
LMArena Russian11881484
LMArena French1185—
LMArena German1164—
LMArena Japanese1126—
LMArena Korean1104—
LMArena Spanish1153—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following11801460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12191482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text11911476
LMArena Creative Writing11201449
LMArena Multi-Turn11771481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper