Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 38.2.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.942.1
Released2024-06-172026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked2427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Coding12511436
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts12071421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math12411432
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Expert11811432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Deepseek Coder v2: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English11821400
LMArena Chinese12011462
LMArena French11851442
LMArena German11641426
LMArena Japanese11261367
LMArena Korean11041352
LMArena Russian11881400
LMArena Spanish11531424

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following11801399

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query12191410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text11911417
LMArena Creative Writing11201368
LMArena Multi-Turn11771416

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper