Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 38.2.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1322 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1308 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1299 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.