Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 32.3 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1208 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.