Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 38.2.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1417 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1386 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.