Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 34.9 to 12.0.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.