Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Neither DeepSeek Coder 6.7B nor Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 43.8% for DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | 52.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 36.4% | 79.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Neither DeepSeek Coder 6.7B nor Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.