Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | 44.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Qwen1.5-110B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.