Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#196); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 41.8 to 35.8.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 145.85 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#196); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.