Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#193); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#193); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.