Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#248); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.8 to 32.3.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#248); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.