Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#144); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1256 |
| SciCode | — | 41.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1400 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 797.73 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 144.47 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8.2% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1407 |
| DTBench | — | 76.8% |
| LMCA | — | 35% |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.4 |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 27.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1428 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1398 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1240 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1461 |
| LMArena French | — | 1424 |
| LMArena German | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1421 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1394 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1417 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#144); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.