Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.8 to 32.2.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | 61.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 36.4% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.