Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B DeepSeek

37.6

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.8 to 31.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and DeepSeek LLM 67B specifications
DeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Noometry Index37.624.9
Released2023-11-022023-11-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
BigCodeBench Instruct35.5%—
LMArena Coding—1096
BigCodeBench Complete43.8%—
HumanEval+71.3%—
MBPP+65.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
Epoch Capabilities Index89.62110.5
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1070
WinoGrande57.6%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.8%
LMArena Math—1108
MATH Level 5—6.4%
GSM8K21.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
GPQA Diamond—24.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge36.4%—
MMLU36.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Non-English—1073
LMArena Chinese—1132

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Instruction Following—1079

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Longer Query—1092

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 6.7BDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Text—1105
LMArena Creative Writing—1067
LMArena Multi-Turn—1082

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper