Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#186); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.337.7
Released2023-11-022025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1413
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Epoch Capabilities Index95.74—
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1364
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1337
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1356

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1356
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#186); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper