Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#225); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#225); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.0 vs 37.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen3 14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.