Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 28.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 42% for DeepSeek Coder 33B and 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index38.929.7
Released2023-11-022024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct42%29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%40.6%
LMArena Coding—1039
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1028
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32—
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math—1089
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert—984
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1000
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1023

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—996

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text—1050
LMArena Creative Writing—1024
LMArena Multi-Turn—989

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper