Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think has enough public results to be ranked (#183); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think has enough public results to be ranked (#183); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.0 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.