Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Grok 3

Grok 3 has enough public results to be ranked (#157); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 3 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 3 leads 41.9 to 38.0.
  • DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and Grok 3 specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index38.939.9
Released2023-11-022025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked940

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1432
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32138.33
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1434
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
LMArena Math—1391
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1421
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
LMArena Non-English—1410
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
IFEval—88.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1409

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGrok 3
LMArena Text—1426
LMArena Creative Writing—1414
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 has enough public results to be ranked (#157); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Grok 3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper