Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs gpt-oss-20b

gpt-oss-20b has enough public results to be ranked (#255); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and gpt-oss-20b in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and gpt-oss-20b specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index38.932.5
Released2023-11-022025-08-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.018
Output $ / M tokens—$0.09
Results tracked934

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
SciCode—34.4%
WeirdML—40.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1306
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—566.05
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
Terminal-Bench—3.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32137.82
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1274
DTBench—68%
LMCA—14.5%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—65.3%
Omni-MATH—56.5%
LMArena Math—1317
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
GPQA Diamond—60.8%
MMLU-Pro—74%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
LMArena Expert—1258
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Non-English—1268
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena German—1255
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1236
LMArena Russian—1278
LMArena Spanish—1267

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
IFEval—73.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1236

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Longer Query—1250

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33Bgpt-oss-20b
LMArena Text—1287
LMArena Creative Writing—1201
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—666
WildBench—73.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1268

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than gpt-oss-20b?

gpt-oss-20b has enough public results to be ranked (#255); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or gpt-oss-20b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.0 vs 37.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and gpt-oss-20b share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and gpt-oss-20b has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper