Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 62.0 to 38.0.
- DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1550 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1548 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1536 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1553 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1538 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon has enough public results to be ranked (#24); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemini 4 Argon share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.