Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#35); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 47.9 to 38.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Noometry Index38.953.6
Released2023-11-022026-04-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierCode—18.8%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—63%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1457
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,306
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32154.49
ARC-AGI-2—61.4%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
ARC-AGI-1—89%
CritPt—16.6%
Chess Puzzles—33%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1444
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—41.7%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—94.4%
ProofBench—56%
LMArena Math—1427
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
GPQA Diamond—91%
SimpleQA Verified—33.6%
LMArena Expert—1441
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1439
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1406
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1421

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1434

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BDeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Text—1432
LMArena Creative Writing—1403
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#35); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and DeepSeek V4 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper