Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#297); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.7 to 31.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 29.6% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and 52.3% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#297); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.