Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Qwen1.5-32B
Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#288); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 29.6% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and 42% for Qwen1.5-32B.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | 42% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1131 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 25.8% | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1100 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#288); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.7 vs 31.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Qwen1.5-32B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.