Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

35.0

Unranked Sparse

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads 31.2 to 27.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index35.029.3
Released2023-11-022024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
LMArena Coding—1101
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
WinoGrande53.3%81.5%
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1100
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index63.6—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Math—17.6%
LMArena Math—1151
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%90.7%
MMLU25.8%75.7%
LMArena Expert—1067
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1087

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text—1110
LMArena Creative Writing—1083
LMArena Multi-Turn—1068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper