Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 39.5 to 31.2.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.