Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#254); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 35.2 to 31.2.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#254); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.