Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs o1-mini

o1-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#235); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

35.0

Unranked Sparse

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and o1-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where o1-mini leads 35.5 to 31.2.
  • DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and o1-mini specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index35.034.0
Released2023-11-022024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
HumanEval+60.4%89%
MBPP+54.8%78.8%
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LiveBench Coding—48%
LMArena Coding—1362
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
Epoch Capabilities Index63.6135.82
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1333
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LiveBench—57.8%
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
LMArena Math—1358
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
LMArena Non-English—1289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1304

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query—1320

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3Bo1-mini
LMArena Text—1317
LMArena Creative Writing—1244
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1314
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than o1-mini?

o1-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#235); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and o1-mini share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper