Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#151); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

34.5

Unranked Sparse

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 35.7 to 30.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index34.539.6
Released2023-11-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev—1263
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LMArena Coding—1461
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index62.18141.42
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1436
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math—1432
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert—1431
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1443
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1414

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query—1414

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text—1421
LMArena Creative Writing—1372
EQ-Bench 4—993
LMArena Multi-Turn—1423

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#151); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper