Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 35.0 to 30.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1223 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1204 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1179 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1201 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.