Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 35.8 to 30.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1247 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1244 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1221 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1240 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1210 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1243 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.