Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.0 to 30.7.
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1320 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1308 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1273 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1279 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.