Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 30.7.
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1423 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1413 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok 4.7 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.