Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has enough public results to be ranked (#65); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.0 to 31.2.
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1457 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1475 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1452 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has enough public results to be ranked (#65); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.