Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1464 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1400 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#135); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok 4.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.