Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Grok-3 mini

Grok-3 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#141); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

35.0

Unranked Sparse

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok-3 mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok-3 mini leads 40.8 to 31.2.
  • DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok-3 mini specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index35.041.2
Released2023-11-022025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
Aider Polyglot—49.3%
WeirdML—42.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LMArena Coding—1379
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
Epoch Capabilities Index63.6140.35
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—16.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1375
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—77.8%
Omni-MATH—31.8%
LMArena Math—1386
MATH Level 5—90.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.9%
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
GPQA Diamond—76.3%
MMLU-Pro—79.9%
Confabulations—10.8%
GPQA (HELM)—67.5%
LMArena Expert—1395
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
LMArena Non-English—1352
LMArena Chinese—1387
LMArena French—1357
LMArena German—1349
LMArena Japanese—1342
LMArena Korean—1335
LMArena Russian—1353
LMArena Spanish—1381

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
IFEval—95.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1357

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
LMArena Longer Query—1372

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGrok-3 mini
LMArena Text—1370
LMArena Creative Writing—1342
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.5%
WildBench—65.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1355

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#141); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Grok-3 mini share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper