Noometry

Model comparison

DBRX vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRXQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderDatabricksAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.439.9
Released2024-03-272026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1132—
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1113—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1145—
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond32.9%82.3%
LMArena Expert1076—

Multilingual Not comparable

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1071—
LMArena Chinese1068—
LMArena French1096—
LMArena German1057—
LMArena Japanese990—
LMArena Korean993—
LMArena Russian1078—
LMArena Spanish1064—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1112—

Long Context Not comparable

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1112—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkDBRXQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1119—
LMArena Creative Writing1104—
LMArena Multi-Turn1111—

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper