Model comparison
DBRX vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
DBRX and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Too close to call
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
DBRX and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.