Model comparison
DBRX vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 14.9.
Side by side
| DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1319 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1316 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.