Model comparison
DBRX vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 33.5 to 14.9.
Side by side
| DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1272 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1266 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1271 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1242 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1252 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1239 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.