Model comparison
DBRX vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.0 to 14.9.
Side by side
| DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DBRX leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1073 |
Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1117 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1064 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual DBRX leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1045 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following DBRX leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1056 |
Long Context DBRX leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1070 |
Writing & Preference DBRX leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1053 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?
DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.