Model comparison
DBRX vs GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 14.9.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | GPT-5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 46.4 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-10-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 272K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $120 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.28 |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than GPT-5 Pro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and GPT-5 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.