Model comparison
DBRX vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 95.9% for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-03-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 78 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1452 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 85.9% |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1455 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.8% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 79.9% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.32 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 82.3% |
Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1450 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 90.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 85.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1452 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1451 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1472 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1473 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1437 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1449 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 91.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1454 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1453 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 67.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.